Most organisations and their leaders take pride in updating their systems with the latest technology and equipment. They devote significant resources to ensure their employees are using state of the art processes and materials. Most organisational leaders would agree that without constant upgrades, they would be trying to achieve success with their hands tied behind their backs.
That’s why it is so baffling that so many of these leaders and their companies continue to operate their most precious “assets” – their employees – using badly dated thinking, outmoded concepts and really old-school beliefs.
As the data from neuroscience continues to mount, we wonder why this crucial evidence-based information is still being so widely overlooked?
One problem is focus – most business leaders simply aren’t focused on this type of information. Some might argue that it is due to a lack of understanding of human dynamics. Many organisational leaders continue to rely on old management philosophies and the mostly discredited theories behind them.
Another thing that keeps old management thinking and systems in place is the persistent belief that psychology is not relevant to business. Certainly our cultural views and policies on mental health reflect a deep seated reluctance to accept the pre-eminence of psychological health in our overall well-being and success.
But in the last fifteen years, there has been unremitting neurological research which reveals fundamental insights about how we humans function. This information is not arbitrary – it’s factual. These studies impact everything about how we structure work. They show how brain functions affect perception, emotion and conscious thought.
While the growing body of neuroscience must stand the scrutiny of further research, we can begin to see applications in the workplace. These core ideas have implications for all management practices:
Evolving Ideas That Should Change the Way We Work
- Managing Expectations – As motivation plays a critical role in the how and why of people functioning, it’s important to understand that the brain is essentially a social organ. Research now clearly shows that the brain’s primary organising principle is to detect whether incoming stimuli is a reward – or threat. It’s part of our early survival mechanism that allows the brain to quickly classify the “danger” level of any situation. According to David Rock, core social domains (such as social status and certainty (control) drive human behaviour.
Rock says, “Labelling and understanding these drivers draws conscious awareness to other non-conscious processes which help in two ways. Knowing the drivers that can cause a threat response in others enables people to design interactions to minimise threats (for example, knowing that a lack of autonomy (for some) may activate a threat response, a leader may consciously avoid micromanaging that employee. Second, knowing about these drivers can activate a reward response enabling people to motivate others more effectively by tapping into internal rewards thereby reducing the reliance on external rewards such as money.”
It raises important questions, for example, about some of the “staples” of the modern workplace like performance reviews and motivation tools that have no basis in understanding individual and group dynamics in light of the social neuroscience.
- Emotional Contagion is real – Studies in the past decade have shown that emotions can be “infectious.” The moods of others, especially those in positions of power, can have a real and lasting effect on individuals and groups. Toxic bosses, bullying environments and aggressive cultures can “breed” more of the same. Leaders play a key role in their ability to influence the spread of certain types of emotions over others.
The evidence shows that while all emotions can be contagious, “negative” emotions have greater power to influence. That makes sense because when we are negatively “triggered” emotionally, the amygdala in the brain’s limbic system is activated and the “fight or flight” system kicks in, draining energy from the pre-frontal cortex (the “reasoning” logical part of the brain). All of this can happen unconsciously, unless we develop the tools to bring it into awareness and mitigate the responses.
- Suppressing Emotions Costs – The prevailing thinking in business still leans towards the maxim that “emotions don’t belong in business.” These declarations are still being made despite overwhelming knowledge that emotion is as integral to human functioning as any of the so-called rational processes. One recent study provided illuminating information on the costs of emotional suppression, which is still the norm, in most workplace situations.
When we suppress any emotion –the resources that are involved in suppressing that emotion come from the same area of our brains (the Pre Frontal Cortex or PFC) that is used for problem solving and analytical thinking. Like a car, the PFC has only a limited supply of fuel, and if we are using that fuel in another area, then you can believe that there is less fuel to service more important things like being effective on the job and managing your other emotions.
UCLA researcher, Dr. Matthew Lieberman, found that learning to “label” our emotions maximises cognitive ability. He asserts that using simple language to “name” anticipated and experienced emotions, actually lowers the arousal of the limbic system producing a quieter brain state. This in turn, allows the PFC to function more effectively. According to Dr. Libermann,”When you attach the word ‘angry as an emotion,’ you see a decreased response in the amygdala, but when you attach the name ‘Harry,’ you don’t see the reduction in the amygdala response. In the same way you hit the brake when you’re driving when you see a yellow light, when you put feelings into words; you seem to be hitting the brakes on your emotional responses. As a result, an individual may feel less angry or less sad.”
The implications of these findings in the workplace (and beyond) are staggering. While we are busy pushing down our true feelings (in some cases we call this being “professional”) we’re not only denying our real experience but we are taxing our cognitive functions and wasting precious brain fuel in the process.
- Creativity Needs Cultivation – A number of large surveys done in the past few years show creativity at the top of the business leader’s wish list in today’s competitive environment. It’s instructive to know then, what creativity needs to thrive. Old notions still prevail about “creative” types – that like “leaders” “creatives” are born – not made. Another prevailing belief that plays a role against “nurturing” the seeds of creativity is attitudes towards sleep. Yes, sleep!
Dr. Jeffrey Ellenbogen, a neurologist at Harvard Medical School explains, “There is a cultural bias against sleep that sees it akin to shutting down – or even death. Most people think of the sleeping brain as similar to a computer that has gone to sleep. Wrong. Sleep enhances performance, learning and memory. Most unappreciated of all, sleep improves creative ability to generate aha! moments and to uncover novel connections among seemingly unrelated ideas.”
While nap rooms in today’s corporations are still rare, resting the body and mind doesn’t just depend on a nap. Increased workloads and cyber overload all contribute to a general sense of overwhelm and exhaustion. It’s not uncommon for people to work 12 hours a day, which in many cases has become the new normal. Many organisational leaders model and expect it. But findings in neuroscience signal that an entirely new mind-set needs to inform how and how long people should work to perform optimally. If one works at 70% then there is the ability to turn up the dial another 30% when times of challenge come to test us. But if you are always working at 100% then you when pressure and stress comes calling, you have nothing left to give and you are likely to be ill and this can lead to burn out and mental health issues.
- Learning Mindfulness – The popular imagery still evokes a holy man sitting in an ashram meditating most of the day. There is general misunderstanding about the differences between being “mindful” and practicing mindfulness meditation. While research results show that meditation offers a wide range of benefits (in remarkably short periods of time) learning to become more “mindful” enhances cognition in amazing ways.
A simple description of mindfulness is “slowing down and examining one’s thought process and learning to be in the moment.” Simple enough it seems, but a tall order for most people. UCLA researchers also describe mindfulness as a technique where someone pays attentions to their thoughts, present emotions and body sensations, without “passing judgment or reacting.” The result is that the amygdala is less activated and emotions are less intense.
A major Canadian study showed mindfulness to be as effective as antidepressants when it came to preventing depression relapse. Other studies show it offers significant benefits in response to stress and anxiety.
The good news is that what we are learning about the brain and its effect on our well-being and work performance is rich with promise. And nearly every study brings more useful – and potentially life changing information, brain hacks, assessments and education that can support and reengineer our minds and our workplaces.
The mysteries of the brain are being uncovered and presented. Only a generation ago, we believed that our brains were static and fixed, prone to inevitable atrophy. Now we are beginning to understand that the brain can rewire itself in remarkable ways and is plastic and can keep growing. And we are the catalysts!
The not-so-good news is that what often remains are the ways we still cling to old ideas about organisational systems that limit rather than maximise human performance.
If you want to learn how to use neuroscience to improve the wellbeing and performance of yourself, your team and your organisation then call us.